A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
Bobby Cannavale as Pete Marino and Nicole Kidman as Dr. Kay Scarpetta.

After eight time-jumping, case-blending episodes, Scarpetta ends with a bang. Well, more of a bludgeon.

The Prime Video series based on Patricia Cornwell's books — namely, the first Dr. Kay Scarpetta book, Postmortem (1990), and Autopsy (2021) — finishes up its first season with some answers, but then leaves major question marks and red herrings flapping about in the air.

Let's get into what happened, what Scarpetta (Nicole Kidman/Rosy McEwen) found out, and what burning questions we have for Season 2 (which Amazon has confirmed is coming). Obviously, spoilers ahead.

Who is killed in Scarpetta?

Nicole Kidman as Dr. Kay Scarpetta.
Nicole Kidman as Scarpetta. Credit: Connie Chornuk / Prime

Scarpetta could have really given us more information about the murder victims.

In 2026, there are two women murdered: Gwen Hainey, biomedical engineer at Thor Labs, who was selling U.S. biotech secrets to Russia, and runner Cammie Ramada, whose death was ruled as "accidental" despite being anything but.

In 1998, there are five women murdered: ER surgeon Lori Petersen's killing begins the series, after the murders of Cecile Tyler, Brenda Steppe, and Patty Lewis. Then, journalist Abby Turnbull's (Sosie Bacon) sister, Hannah, is also murdered.

Who is the killer in Scarpetta?

Jake Cannavale as Peter Marino, Rosy McEwen as Dr. Kay Scarpetta.
Jake Cannavale as Pete Marino, Rosy McEwen as Dr. Kay Scarpetta. Credit: Connie Chornuk / Prime

There are two killers in Scarpetta, one in the past and one in the present.

1998 killer: Roy McCorkle

Through glittery government soap and emergency call records, '90s Scarpetta figured out the identity of the serial killer she, homicide detective Pete Marino (Jake Cannavale), and FBI profiler Benton Wesley (Hunter Parrish) had been investigating. The killer is Roy McCorkle (Martin De Boer), a local 911 dispatcher who had chosen his victims based on their voices.

2026 killer: August Ryan

In the present, the murderer is revealed to be a copycat. Officer August Ryan, the braces-wearing cop Scarpetta has worked with since the '90s murders, is the killer of Gwen Hainey and Cammie Ramada.

Scarpetta first meets Officer Ryan at the murder scene of Lori Peterson in Berkley Heights in 1998. "I was never the first on a scene before, of a grisly murder," he tells her, visibly affected by the violence. This murder ignited Ryan's penchant for violence but his traumatic past also played a part (more on that below). Later, at the scene of McCorkle's death, Ryan calls him a "murdering bastard," and scorns "what he did to those women," despite those being actions he will repeat 28 years later.

In 2026, Ryan is the first person Scarpetta talks to at the crime scene where Gwen Hainey is found in episode 1. Ryan leads Scarpetta to the victim, pretending to have just encountered the scene he created. Ryan then meets Scarpetta and Marino at the condo where Gwen Hainey was attacked — he even smugly declares that he "found" the murder weapon and reports that Matt Peterson's fingerprints are all over it (Lori Peterson's husband, the main suspect of the 1998 murders), which sends Scarpetta and Marino off course. In episode 4, Ryan does it again, leading medical examiner Dr. Debbie Kaminsky (Ashley Shelton) to Cammie Ramada's body, a crime scene he also created.

Motive? "I did it to impress just the right gal," Ryan says in the finale, referring to Scarpetta herself.

What's with the 3D-printed organ business?

In Scarpetta, Thor Labs is a tech company that 3D prints human organs. And though the storyline goes off on a tangent with dead astronauts, the most important thing is that the company links the murder victims in 2026.

Gwen Hainey and Cammie Ramada both bear skin grafts, pieces of biosynthetic skin made by Thor Labs. Remember, Hainey was a biomedical engineer there, working on the Thor Orbiter Project (3D printing human organs in space). In the finale, Scarpetta receives a call from Officer Blaise Fruge (Tiya Sircar) saying there was a third person in Thor's skin test group, but Fruge is cut off before naming them.

"That's how he met them," Fruge says. "They were in the same group."

That person? August Ryan, who, as a child, burned his arm on a train track the night he witnessed his uncle committing sexual assault. Presumably, Ryan was after a skin graft. As to the pennies? Ryan's uncle distracted him with a penny during his crime, one the kid was trying to retrieve from the hot track when he was burned; pennies were left at the murder sites of Gwen Hainey and Cammie Ramada, and Scarpetta finds a penny on her dining room table.

What's the deal with Maggie and Reddy?

Maggie Cutbush (Stephanie Faracy/Georgia King) spends the present-day storyline basically being a creep and an anti-feminist pain in the ass, but there's more going on here than meets the eye.

In the '90s, Maggie was appointed Scarpetta's assistant when her computer was hacked for information about the Peterson case. Scarpetta wrongfully accused Maggie and fired her. However, the culprit was Dr. Elvin Reddy (Alex Klein), Scarpetta's professional rival, who also tampered with evidence to discredit Kay.

Now, Dr. Reddy is a piece of work. He wanted Scarpetta's job of Virginia's chief medical examiner back in the '90s, so always had a chip on his shoulder. Reddy hires Maggie as his own assistant, and the show suggests an abuse of power and sexual harassment. In episode 4, Scarpetta looks into Cammie Ramada's death, ruled as "undetermined" by medical examiner Kaminsky. But Scarpetta finds out that Reddy (chief medical examiner by this point) had shown up at the autopsy with a bunch of FBI agents (the crime scene goes across federal and district lines) and essentially bullied Kaminsky to rule Cammie Ramada's death an accident.

In the present, Maggie is deployed again as a "direct line" between Scarpetta's office and Reddy, now health commissioner (and Scarpetta's boss). Importantly, Reddy and Maggie know Scarpetta's secret: She killed McCorkle in self-defense in the '90s — and Marino covered it up for her. Scarpetta did the autopsy, then lied about the findings, but notably, Reddy came into the morgue and indicated he knew there was more to the killer's death than Marino's bullets.

In the finale, Maggie flips the script telling Scarpetta she has proof to bring their dodgy boss down. "Pick a crime," she says. "I'll get you everything you need to nail the bastard. Leave me out of it, and I'll leave you out of it."

What's going on with Benton Wesley?

Simon Baker as Benton Wesley.
Simon Baker as Benton Wesley. Credit: Connie Chornuk / Prime

Scarpetta's cardboard husband, Benton Wesley, has dark secrets. We know he left his wife and kids for Kay, and is having an affair with his FBI cybercrime partner Sierra Patron (Anna Diop). We also know he had a traumatic childhood involving neurodivergence and reading disturbing material before his career as a serial killer profiler.

In the finale, Scarpetta tracks Wesley to his definitely illegal interrogation truck at home using Find My Friends, and he warns her to stop investigating Gwen Hainey and Cammie Ramada "before it's too late" without elaborating. He's also sent hacker Jinx Slater (Luke Jones) to jail for his girlfriend Gwen Hainey's murder, presumably to keep the FBI's Thor Orbiter investigation under wraps.

However, during the scene, Wesley gets...creepy, saying he has some "strange behaviours" and that "there are some creatures that I enjoy to watch suffer," which seems like he's about to confess to his "real self" being real dark. We all saw him watch that fly die in pain, and we won't forget his creepy childhood lair in the basement. But then he simply asks for a divorce. What a fake-out.

Is Matt Peterson actually innocent?

Matt Peterson (Graham Phillips/Anson Mount), the husband of Lori Peterson, appears to be Scarpetta's red herring. He's the guy Marino (Bobby Cannavale) suspected and punched, who runs a cultish grief farm (where Lucy inexplicably ends up in the finale — girl, wyd). But is he actually as innocent as he seems? Sure, he just happened to meet Gwen Hainey in a bar trying to bring his wife back to life with 3D-printed organs. But in episode 1, when a young Marino is interviewing a young Peterson, the suspect mentions one of the first things he noticed meeting Lori in college was her "contralto" voice. "Stopped me in my tracks," he says. "Its actual tone was perfection." Marino counters, asking, "You notice a thing like that, huh?" How did McCorkle choose his victims? Their voices. Still a red herring?

Who "killed" Janet?

Ariana DeBose as Lucy Farinelli-Watson.
Ariana DeBose as Lucy Farinelli-Watson. Credit: Connie Chornuk / Prime

Both Kay and Dorothy (Jamie Lee Curtis) say they didn't "kill" Janet, the AI version of Lucy's (Ariana DeBose) wife that she's been talking to daily since her real death, but she's sure one of them did it. So, was it one of them? Or was it, say, Blaise Fruge, who wanted to exact a little bit of revenge on her lover for walking out during their argument about Blaise losing her job thanks to Lucy's "joy ride" to The Orchard? Or perhaps Janet did find a code back door to walk out of...

Don’t miss out on our latest stories: Add Mashable as a trusted news source in Google.

Who's at the door?

In the final moments of Scarpetta, we see that Kay has absolutely baseball-batted Ryan to death. Then, someone arrives at the door, sees everything, and Scarpetta's reaction is one of pure shock: "Oh no."

Who could it be? Is it Lucy coming home from her grief session? Is it Marino coming back to declare his feelings? Is it Fruge, following her partner Ryan's whereabouts? Or is it someone we haven't met yet?

Scarpetta is now streaming on Prime Video.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/y8mdsDY
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
Festival attendees watch as guests arrives on the red carpet

SXSW 2026 kicks off this week in Austin, and Mashable will be reporting live from the event. Check back soon for a deep dive into all the movies premiering at SXSW. For now, we wanted to break down all the tech news and events kicking off this week.

If the session lineup is any indication, the tech conversations dominating the festival floor aren't going to be comfortable ones. From the creeping fear that AI is quietly hollowing out our capacity to think, to a generational reckoning over what work even means anymore, this year's tech and digital culture programming is shaping up to be one of the most charged in recent memory.

Worth flagging for veterans: SXSW has scrapped the Creative Industries Expo this year. In its place, the festival is leaning into the XR Experience and Emerging Tech Expo, so expect the floor to reflect the same themes dominating the panels: AI, immersive tech, and how to create art with emerging technologies.

Here's what's worth paying attention to.

AI, AI, AI, and more AI

You may have heard about The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist, a buzzy new documentary playing at the festival. Mashable entertainment editor Kristy Puchko will be hosting a panel on the film. SXSW is also hosting dozens of events and panels about AI.

One of the most quietly urgent panels on the schedule is AI & the Brain: As We Embrace AI, Let's Not Forget Our Minds, hitting the Westin Austin Downtown on March 12. The panel — featuring MIT professor Sanjay Sarma, Edifii co-founder Izzat Jarudi, and Massachusetts Board of Education chairman Chris Gabrieli — isn't here to dunk on AI. It's asking a harder question: as machines get smarter, are we getting lazier? The session wrestles with what rapid AI adoption is doing to our capacity to reason, create, and learn independently. Expect this one to draw a crowd.

Also happening on March 12 is a sitdown with journalist Tara Palmeri and Imran Ahmed — CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate — for Who Owns the Truth? The session takes a hard look at how algorithms, AI, and a fractured media ecosystem are rewiring how people decide what's real. With trust in institutions continuing to crater, the conversation promises to be less theoretical and more urgent than the title might suggest.

On March 14 at the JW Marriott, Cloudflare co-founder and CEO Matthew Prince — whose company handles 20 percent of all internet traffic — teams up with Mansueto Ventures CEO Stephanie Mehta for The Internet After Search. The premise is blunt: the economic model that has funded the internet for thirty years is breaking. AI systems now answer questions directly, AI agents are completing transactions without users ever landing on a website, and content creators are hemorrhaging traffic and revenue with no clear replacement in sight. Who controls information access? Who gets paid for content? Nobody has figured it out yet — but this session is going to try.

TikTok, trade schools, and the creator economy

The From TikTok to Toolbelt panel tackles what might be the most counterintuitive workforce story of the decade. Over half of Gen Z respondents in a recent survey said they're considering skilled trades — up 12% from last year.

The panel, which includes voices from Frisco ISD, Interplay Learning, and education outlet The 74 Million, digs into how schools are scrambling to modernize career prep and meet students where they actually are.

Not everything has to be existential, however. Spotify co-CEO Gustav Söderström is hosting a session, tracing the company's origin story — born out of the wreckage of music piracy — and laying out what comes next for audio, joined by country star Lainey Wilson and podcast host David Friedberg on March 13. And Keke Palmer is rolling into Austin with the full cast of I Love Boosters — Naomi Ackie, Taylour Paige, Eiza González, Poppy Liu, and Demi Moore — for a live recording of Baby, This Is Keke Palmer. If you need a breather from the AI doom panels, you've got options.

Closing out the festival on March 15, YouTuber and former Instagram and YouTube insider Jon Youshaei takes the stage for the Social Media Masterclass 2026. Youshaei spent eight years inside two of the biggest platforms on the planet before building his own audience past the 1 million follower mark, and he's bringing that institutional knowledge to Austin.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/cjZpS1W
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
A woman with white hair holding a sign saying

Elon Musk's Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) was officially disbanded in Nov. 2025. But we're just starting to learn the extent of the damage wrought by this extraordinary IT department, which experts warn still exists in all but name.

Case in point: A whistleblower report filed with the inspector general of the Social Security Administration, first revealed Wednesday by the Washington Post. This anonymous whistleblower alleges that an unnamed ex-DOGE employee took a thumb drive of sensitive Social Security data on millions of Americans to his next employer — while boasting to former colleagues that he still had "god-level access" to highly sensitive agency data.

The whistleblower's claims are being investigated by the agency's still-functional Office of Inspector General, according to a letter sent to congressional oversight committees and obtained by multiple outlets. If true, the allegations would constitute "one of the largest known data breaches in American history," Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon told The Independent, with "the explicit purpose of weaponizing Americans’ sensitive personal data for political gain."

The DOGE employee also told a former co-worker he expected to receive a presidential pardon if his actions were considered illegal, the whistleblower report claims.

This isn't the first DOGE-related Social Security scandal under investigation. Another whistleblower at the agency claimed last August that DOGE had created a "live copy of the country's Social Security information in a cloud environment that circumvents oversight."

According to a six-month investigation by a congressional committee, DOGE's handling of data has put U.S. citizens at high risk. That report quoted an internal Social Security Administration risk assessment, stating the likelihood of a "catastrophic adverse effect" — one that might require every single American with a Social Security number to receive a new one.

The Social Security Administration has experienced data breaches prior to DOGE; we've explained what you can do if you fear your number has been exposed. This latest whistleblower complaint, however, seems to put the potential for such risks on a whole new level.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/2FlErhg
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
A stylized, colorful image of a pair of hands working on a laptop surrounded by tax forms. The laptop screen is taken up by a giant ChatGPT logo.

We've come a long way from the days of lugging boxes of receipts over to your accountant's office. By 2022, 150.6 million individual federal income tax returns were filed electronically, accounting for 94 percent of all individual filings that year, according to Pew Research.

Four years later, many tax services offer their own AI-powered tools to streamline tax filing, including automatic form-filling and deduction calculators, as well as on-site AI assistants to answer basic tax questions. 

Around 30 percent of Americans say they will be use an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, to help prepare their taxes, according to a recent survey by McAfee. Another poll found that nearly half of Americans trust AI to give them tax advice. Those rates are higher among younger taxpayers  — and men — according to surveys. 

But universal chatbots and LLMs are very different than AI tools on tax prep sites from companies like H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt. "You don't want to be using chatbots as your tax consultants," warned Abhishek Karnik, head of threat intelligence research at McAfee. "They're not the experts."

Why chatbots seem like an easy answer 

It makes sense that more people would turn to chatbots for tax help, cybersecurity professionals tell Mashable. The end of the IRS' Direct File program and recent legislation, primarily President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, has generated increasing confusion about federal taxes — on top of an already complicated tax code.  

"Many individuals see chatbots as an easy way to translate confusing guidance into plain language," explained Christopher Caen, CEO of AI cybersecurity firm Mill Pond Research. "At the same time, rising costs for professional help and increased comfort with AI in everyday tasks are driving experimentation."

As AI becomes more embedded in routine activities, especially among younger generations new to filing, more Americans will naturally turn to their daily AI assistant for tax purposes, said Karnik. 

Don't give ChatGPT your personal information

But deferring to ChatGPT as your personal tax assistant could have real financial and security consequences, experts say. 

Keep personal documents offline

"General-purpose chatbots aren’t designed to securely handle highly sensitive financial information," Caen said. Any personal information uploaded to a platform like ChatGPT is vulnerable to exposure. 

When it comes to taxes, less data shared is always the safer approach.
- Christopher Caen, Mill Pond Research

Platform breaches, for example, could expose users' private conversations to bad actors. Users' live chats can be intercepted by malicious browser extensions or compromised devices. Caen says that even publicly shared prompts or copies of chatbot outputs can put users' sensitive information at risk. Both Caen and Karnik warn of an increase in phishing sites masquerading as AI tools, as well as spoofed tax sites enhanced by powerful generative AI. 

"When it comes to taxes, less data shared is always the safer approach," said Caen. 

In addition to the text content of chats, any files uploaded to chatbots are also at risk, Karnik warned. Never upload full tax forms, your Social Security number, or bank account details, experts warn. Avoid other personally identifiable information, too, like your employer's details or your address.

"We don't know where this information is eventually ending up," said Karnik. "It's going somewhere. It's being processed by some Large Language Model. Who knows how it will be utilized for training."

ChatGPT is no math whiz 

Another reason to avoid chatbot accountants, according to Karnik: Most LLMs aren't good at doing the math. Users have shared ChatGPT errors on the r/tax subreddit, like incorrect income tax figures and misunderstandings of capital gains tax brackets. 

And while ChatGPT and its competitors have recently improved in their ability to do complex calculations, they aren't infallible. Nuances in tax law and IRS procedures change frequently, Karnik explained, with chatbot models potentially pulling from outdated sources or coalescing information that spans differing state and federal codes. 

Hallucinations are still a problem, too. "In general, you can't trust the output," Karnik said. "You don't want that to turn into an issue with the IRS, because the IRS doesn't care if you say 'the AI told me so.'"

Use chatbots in moderation

Instead, security and tax professionals encourage taxpayers to seek out in-person, professional help if it's available (and financially feasible) for you to do so. Karnik says this lessens the chances of you being victim to tax scams or digital attacks by a bad actor.

But they also recognize that not everyone is able to hire their own tax pro.

In general, practicing good digital hygiene will keep the impact of potential AI-powered breaches to a minimum. Use secure, well-known platforms, enable multifactor authentication, and avoid accessing financial tools on public or unsecured networks, recommends Caen. Karnik suggests not completing your taxes while traveling or using a VPN if you must, regardless of the digital tools you choose, as unknown networks could open you up to malicious attacks. 

If you can't get away from the allure of the chatbots, both Caen and Karnik recommend using them only for general guidance. "Think of AI as a research assistant," said Caen. 

You can ask AI tools to explain deductions, terminology, or filing steps, without providing your personal tax details. Use ChatGPT's responses to organize questions you'll pose to human professionals. 

"These tools are good guides," said Karnik. "It doesn't mean you can take their advice, especially for tax filing."

Want to learn more about getting the best out of your tech? Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories and Deals newsletters today.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/J4A8twp
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
Paris Saint-Germain's Portuguese midfielder #17 Vitinha

TL;DR: Live stream PSG vs. Chelsea in the Champions League for free on Virgin Media Player. Access this free live stream from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.


The Champions League is back this week with a number of interesting matchups, but PSG vs. Chelsea might be the best of the bunch. It's the defending champions against the two-time winners — it's shaping up to be something special.

PSG lead Ligue 1, but they've not been that dominant this season. They are only one point ahead of Lens in the standings and some might argue that they got lucky in the playoff round against Monaco. The defending champions have a lot of quality, but they need to get it together in this contest. Chelsea haven't exactly been great this season, but they'll believe that they can progress into the quarter finals.

If you want to watch PSG vs. Chelsea in the Champions League for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is PSG vs. Chelsea?

PSG vs. Chelsea in the Champions League kicks off at 8 p.m. GMT on March 11. This fixture takes place at the Parc des Princes.

How to watch PSG vs. Chelsea for free

PSG vs. Chelsea is available to live stream for free on Virgin Media Player.

Virgin Media Player is geo-restricted to Ireland, but anyone can access this free streaming platform with a VPN. These tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in Ireland, meaning you can unblock Virgin Media Player to stream the Champions League for free from anywhere in the world.

Live stream PSG vs. Chelsea for free by following these simple steps:

  1. Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

  2. Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

  3. Open up the app and connect to a server in Ireland

  4. Visit Virgin Media Player

  5. Watch PSG vs. Chelsea for free from anywhere in the world

Credit: ExpressVPN
$12.95 only at ExpressVPN (with money-back guarantee)

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but most do offer free-trials or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can watch PSG vs. Chelsea without committing with your cash. This isn't a long-term solution, but it does give you enough time to stream select Champions League fixtures before recovering your investment.

What is the best VPN for Virgin Media Player?

ExpressVPN is the best choice for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport on Virgin Media Player, for a number of reasons:

  • Servers in 105 countries including Ireland

  • Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

  • Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure

  • Fast connection speeds free from throttling

  • Up to 10 simultaneous connections

  • 30-day money-back guarantee

A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. This plan includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99 (with money-back guarantee).

Watch PSG vs. Chelsea in the Champions League for free with ExpressVPN.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/1MxOkbm
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
Trump sits at his desk in the Oval Office. He is leaned over, signing an executive order.

It's been less than a year since the Trump administration announced its sprawling AI action plan, and the government continues to push for America to be the global leader in AI.

And while American opinion on AI remains mixed, adoption of AI tools has grown domestically. U.S.-based AI companies are taking products to market at breakneck speeds. According to a 2025 Stanford report, the U.S. is building more top AI models than any other country.

With this as proof that their plan is working, federal leaders are charging ahead with new infrastructure plans and AI executive orders, from beefing up AI stack workers to coordinating military deployment. Here's what's happened over the last month:

Ratepayer Protection Pledge 

In an apparent gesture to assuage growing concern about the impact of nationwide data centers, Trump unveiled the buzzy Ratepayer Protection Pledge on March 5. 

The voluntary, non-binding pledge is a tech industry commitment to provide or pay for all energy costs associated with AI projects. Signees agree to add new power stations instead of relying on existing power grids, cover costs of upgrading existing energy systems, and negotiate separate rate structures with local utility companies, when possible. It was signed by Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Amazon Web Services, Oracle, and xAI, following months of comments by Trump encouraging tech companies to "pay their own way" toward a larger national AI infrastructure. 

Speaking at a White House roundtable on March 4, Trump said that Big Tech needed the "PR help," responding to a growing body of complaints that tech companies were offloading energy costs onto residents near data centers. "Because people think that if a data center goes in, their electricity prices are going to go up, and that’s not happening," the president said. "It’s not going to happen."

To the chagrin of climate activists, the agreement does not mention limiting the environmental impacts of data centers. And energy experts say that long-term energy cost reduction will take years to be reflected in the bills of community members  — if companies actually stick to their promises. 

U.S. Tech Corps 

On Feb. 22, the Trump administration quietly unveiled its new Tech Corps, an offshoot of the nation's Peace Corps, that will send trained Americans abroad to evangelize about American AI technology. 

Tech Corps members, who must have proven tech skills, will be assigned to projects in participating American AI Exports Program countries, participating in what the government calls "last mile" AI deployment, CNBC reports. A list of participating countries has yet to be announced.   

The Tech Corps will "help countries around the world harness American artificial intelligence to enhance opportunity and prosperity for their citizens," the official website reads. Examples on the website include working alongside schools to accelerate AI adoption, assisting national offices in co-developing AI models, and offering virtual project options in collaboration with American tech companies. Tech Corps volunteers serve 12 to 27-month placements, and on-ground deployments are expected to begin this fall. Like the Peace Corps, volunteers will get covered housing, healthcare, and a living stipend. 

The Trump administration has said it will harness the agency's existing infrastructure to "turbocharge" the mission of "promoting World Peace and friendship."

Don't confuse the Tech Corps with the Trump administration's Tech Force, a two-year training and fellowship program aimed at recruiting a fleet of AI specialists and technologists. At the time, the administration explained the program would result in about "1,000 technology specialists hired by agencies to accelerate artificial intelligence (AI) implementation and solve the federal government's most critical technological challenges." The advertised salary for the select few ranges from $150,000 up to $200,000 — no degree required.​

AI-enabled Department of War 

But the biggest headline out of Trump's recent tech agenda is actually an escalating feud, as the administration's Department of War goes head-to-head with some of the country's leading AI companies. Amid a new war with Iran, the government hopes to use the modern tech to boost the country's warfare capacity. 

Part of the administration's efforts to modernize federal offices and integrate AI across departments, AI developers including OpenAI, Google, Perplexity, and Anthropic have snagged multimillion dollar contracts to deploy their services across the federal government and even work directly with federal agencies.

But a recent $200 million deal with Anthropic over the use of Claude by the U.S. military has since fallen through, after the company drew a hard line on utilizing its models to engage in potential mass domestic surveillance or power autonomous weapons under the Department of War. In response, Trump ordered an immediate termination of the use of Claude by government agencies and later declared Anthropic a "supply-chain risk" to national security, even as rumors circulated that negotiations had been reopened. In the meantime, OpenAI swooped in to take over the agreement, with CEO Sam Altman admitting the agreement to use OpenAI's model was rushed. 

"I think we are heading towards a world where the relationship between governments and AI efforts is critical," Altman wrote in a lengthy X post. "This will be difficult but it has to happen; I do not see any good future where we don't get there."



from Mashable https://ift.tt/ygovaLn
A blog about Technology, new invention and ways of looking.
A phone displaying the New York Times game 'Connections.'

Today's Connections: Sports Edition is easy for people who watch women's sports.

As we've shared in previous hints stories, this is a version of the popular New York Times word game that seeks to test the knowledge of sports fans.

Like the original Connections, the game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier — so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for the latest Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

What is Connections: Sports Edition?

The NYT's latest daily word game has launched in association with The Athletic, the New York Times property that provides the publication's sports coverage. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer.

If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake — players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

Here's a hint for today's Connections: Sports Edition categories

Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

  • Yellow: Centennial State teams

  • Green: Midwest football cities

  • Blue: Racecars

  • Purple: Colorado coach

Here are today's Connections: Sports Edition categories

Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:

  • Yellow: A Colorado Athlete

  • Green: NFC North Cities

  • Blue: Types of Racing

  • Purple: Coach___

Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today's Connections: Sports Edition #532 is...

What is the answer to Connections: Sports Edition today?

  • A Colorado Athlete - BRONCO, BUFFALO, NUGGET, ROCKIE

  • NFC North Cities - CHICAGO, DETROIT, GREEN BAY, MINNEAPOLIS

  • Types of Racing - BMX, DRAG, HORSE, STOCK CAR

  • Coach___ - CARTER, K, PRIME, SPEAK

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new sports Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/5uqimQN